Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 2082

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e a common issue both are taken up together for disposal. 2. In the assessees appeal No. C/57/2011, the facts are that the appellants imported titanium sheets for clearance under Status Holder Incentive Scheme (SHIS) claiming benefit of Notification No. 104/2009 dated 14.9.2009. The adjudicating authority denied the benefit of notification on the ground that titanium sheets are not capital goods. On appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order. 3. In appeal No. C/41438/2013, filed by Revenue, the issue are identical but relating to subsequent imports of same item, where the adjudicating authority denied the exemption Notification No. 104/2009 and also confirmed Rs. 5,73,026/- under section 28(2) of Customs Act, 1962. On appeal, lea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pecifically included under the capital goods. Once the goods are allowed in one scheme as capital goods the same cannot be denied for SHIS scheme. Once the licensing authority has allowed the goods under capital goods customs authorities cannot question the licensing authority and deny the benefit. He also submits that the Commissioner (Appeals) in their own case for subsequent period has allowed and held that the impugned goods are capital goods only. He relied on the following decisions:- (a) Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. CC, Bangalore 2009 (240) ELT 461 (b) Heinz India Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala 2009 (245) ELT 71 (Ker.) For the Revenue appeal, the learned counsel reiterated the findings of the Commissioner (Appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s required for manufacture or production, either directly or indirectly, of goods or for rendering services, including those required for replacement, modernization, technological upgradation or expansion. It also includes packaging machinery and equipment, refractories for initial lining, refrigeration equipment, power generating sets, machine tools, catalysts for initial charge, equipment and instruments for testing, research and development, quality and pollution control. Capital goods may be for use in manufacturing, mining, agriculture, aquaculture, animal husbandry, floriculture, horticulture, pisciculture, poultry, sericulture and viticulture as well as for use in services sector. We also find that the definition of capital goods ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce the licensing authorities include any item as capital goods, the same is to be allowed by customs. Therefore, we hold that the lower authority in his impugned order dated 28.3.2013 has rightly held titanium sheets are capital goods covered under the capital goods definition and the same is eligible under SHIS scrip under Notification No. 104/2009. 12. In the regard, The Tribunal in the case of Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. CC, Bangalore (supra) held that the definition of capital goods as per FTP is wide and once the policy allows such items it is not open for customs to object that it is only forms part of the capital goods. In the present case we find that the licensing authority themselves have allowed titanium s....