Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether titanium sheets imported under the Status Holder Incentive Scheme were eligible as capital goods for exemption under Notification No. 104/2009.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods in the notification was wide and inclusive, covering plant, machinery, equipment, accessories and items required directly or indirectly for manufacture or production, including refractories for initial lining. The titanium sheets were used as lining material in chemical reactors for a corrosive process and were therefore employed as part of the reactor structure in the assessee's manufacturing activity. The goods were also specifically included as capital goods in the EPCG licence, and the definition under the Foreign Trade Policy was treated as identical to the notification. Once the licensing authority had accepted the items as capital goods, customs could not take a different view on the same goods for SHIS clearance.
Conclusion: The titanium sheets were capital goods eligible for exemption under Notification No. 104/2009, so the assessee's appeal was allowed and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The exemption benefit was upheld for the imported titanium sheets, and the contrary order disallowing the benefit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the policy and notification define capital goods in inclusive terms and the licensing authority classifies the imported item as capital goods for the same import scheme framework, customs cannot deny that classification merely because the goods function as lining material or form part of the capital equipment.