Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1850

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DER Per Anil Choudhary This appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. SN/96/NGP/2009 dated 30.3.2009 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur whereby the Order-in-Original dated 19/12/2008 was set aside and the appeal of the respondent was allowed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent, M/s Uniworth Textiles Ltd., are engag....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the additional duty became recoverable from the manufacturer or importer of inputs or capital goods on account of any non levy or short levy by reason of fraud, collusion or any willful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any provisions of the Excise Act, or of the Customs Act or the rules made thereunder with an intent to evade payment of duty. Therefore, a show-cause notic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eels Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem - 2009 (9) RLT 106 (CESTAT-Che.) cannot be followed, as the same has not been accepted by the department and preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras. Thus, the said judgment has not attained finality. Accordingly, he prays that the impugned order is not proper, correct and legal and needs to be set aside. 4. The learned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Steel Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem - 2009 (90) RLT 106 (CESTAT-Che), wherein it was held that Explanation to clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules applied to supplementary invoice only and not to invoice issued by input service provider covered by clauses (e), (f) and (g) of sub-rule (1), credit of tax paid by appellant on service received as per legal p....