<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of CENVAT Credit under Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision was based on the interpretation that the credit availed by the assessee on input services through TR-6 challans was proper under the law, as Rule 9(b) did not apply to service tax transactions, citing precedent and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1850 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of CENVAT Credit under Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision was based on the interpretation that the credit availed by the assessee on input services through TR-6 challans was proper under the law, as Rule 9(b) did not apply to service tax transactions, citing precedent and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>