Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (9) TMI 865

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er Section 5 of the PMLA issued by the respondent No.2. 2. Since both these petitions have arisen out of the same show cause notice and involves common question of law therefore, both the petitions are taken up together. 3. The facts as borne out from W.P.(C) No. 8266/2015 are that on 08.03.2014, officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (for short "DRI"), Kolkata intercepted one Toyota Fortuner Car on Taki road, near Beliaghata Bill, North 24 Parganas. At the time of interception the petitioner‟s husband (petitioner in 8359/2015) was present in that car and the same was being driven by Mr. Mokesed Mondal. A total 44.659 Kgs of Gold of foreign origin (containing 12 pcs. of gold Bars and 280 pcs. of Gold Biscuits) valued at 13.56 crores was recovered and seized by the officers of DRI. A show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 was issued to the petitioner‟s husband and to Mr. Moksed Mandal. Thereafter, a case under the PMLA was initiated against the petitioner‟s husband and the same is now pending before the learned Chief Judge City Sessions Court and Special Court under PMLA. On 21.05.2015 the petitioner received a provisional attac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected [proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming] it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money-laundering. Section 5 - Attachment of property involved in money-laundering (1) Where the Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director authorised by the Director for the purposes of this section, has reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing), on the basis of material in his possession, that- (a) any person is in possession of any proceeds of crime; and (b) such proceeds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime under this Chapter, he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days from the date of the order, in such manner as may be prescribed: Provided that no such order of attachment shall be made unless, in relation to the scheduled offence, a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under sub-section (5) of section 5, or applications made under sub-section (4) of section 17 or under sub-section (10) of section 18, if the Adjudicating Authority has reason to believe that any person has committed an [offence under section 3 or is in possession of proceeds of crime] it may serve a notice of not less than thirty days on such person calling upon him to indicate the sources of his income, earning or assets, out of which or by means of which he has acquired the property attached under sub-section (1) of section 5, or, seized [or frozen] under section 17 or section 18, the evidence on which he relies and other relevant information and particulars, and to show cause why all or any of such properties should not be declared to be the properties involved in money-laundering and confiscated by the Central Government: Provided that where a notice under this sub-section specifies any property as being held by a person on behalf of any other person, a copy of such notice shall also be served upon such other person: Provided further that where such property is held jointly by more than one person, such notice shall be served to all persons holding such prope....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ring has been committed, it shall order that such property involved in the money-laundering or which has been used for commission of the offence of money-laundering shall stand confiscated to the Central Government. (6) Where on conclusion of a trial under this Act, the Special Court finds that the offence of money-laundering has not taken place or the property is not involved in money-laundering, it shall order release of such property to the person entitled to receive it. (7) Where the trial under this Act cannot be conducted by reason of the death of the accused or the accused being declared a proclaimed offender or for any other reason or having commenced but could not be concluded, the Special Court shall, on an application moved by the Director or a person claiming to be entitled to possession of a property in respect of which an order has been passed under sub-section (3) of section 8, pass appropriate orders regarding confiscation or release of the property, as the case may be, involved in the offence of money-laundering after having regard to the material before it.] [(8) Where a property stands confiscated to the Central Government under sub-sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndering and to provide for confiscation of property derived from, or involved in, money-laundering and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. On a plain reading of the aforementioned sections, it is clear that under Section 2 (u) of PMLA any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence is proceeds of crime. 7. Section 3 of PMLA, prescribes the offence of money laundering and its punishment is prescribed under Section 4 of PMLA. To attract the provisions of Section 3 of PMLA, it is necessary that the person is indulged in proceeds of crime. Further, in terms of Section 5 of PMLA where the Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director authorised by the Director, has reason to believe, on the basis of material in his possession that any person is in possession of proceeds of crime and such proceeds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any manner, he may provisionally attach such proceeds of crime based on the said material reasons to believe that are to be given in writing. After every order of such attachment the Director, or an....