https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264197 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the show cause notice and provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the notice and order were issued in accordance with the provisions of the Act and that the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 should not be invoked prematurely when effective remedies under the PMLA are available. The court emphasized the need to respect the statutory mechanism of the PMLA and dismissed the petitions and associated applications. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264197 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the show cause notice and provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the notice and order were issued in accordance with the provisions of the Act and that the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 should not be invoked prematurely when effective remedies under the PMLA are available. The court emphasized the need to respect the statutory mechanism of the PMLA and dismissed the petitions and associated applications. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264197