Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (9) TMI 620

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri G Jha, AR ORDER Per: H K Thakur: This appeal has been filed by the Appellant against OIA No. CCEA-SRT-II/SSP-223/u/s35A(3), dt.07.01.2013, under which OIO No.37/NKS-JC/DIV-II ANK/DEM/2011, dt.21.09.2011 passed by the Adjudicating authority has been upheld. The issue involved is regarding credit taken by the Appellant with respect to ISD invoices issued by the Head Office of the Appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....situated in Gujarat has no jurisdiction to raise demand with respect to ISD invoice issued by their Head Office at Mumbai. That the only requirement for taking credit is that ISD invoice should be issued by the Head Office and should contain all the details as prescribed by the Rules. He relied upon the case law of CCE Vs Godfrey Philips India Ltd [2009 (14) STR 375 ((Tri-Ahmd). It was his case th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....only w.e.f. 01.04.2011. It was strongly argued by the learned Advocate of the Appellant that the period involved in the present appeal is March 2008, which is before the date of amendment of Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. He relied upon the case law of this Bench in the case of Cadmac Machinery Co. (P) Ltd Vs CCE Ahmedabad [2013 (31) STR (Tri-Ahmd)], where an activity in relation to valuat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....merit, First Appellate Authority had denied the credit on the ground that the services of Professional Fees & Brokerage for sale of Land is not in relation to manufacturing activity and is not eligible for CENVAT Credit. It is observed from the case records that the period involved in the present proceedings is March 2008 when the words activity relating to business were existing in the definition....