https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263952 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit on ISD invoices issued by the Head Office. The services related to Professional Fees & Brokerage for land transactions were considered qualifying under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 during the relevant period. The Tribunal cited previous case laws to support this decision, emphasizing that business-related activities should qualify for credit. As the period predated the Rule 2(l) amendment, the Appellant was entitled to the CENVAT Credit, with no address of the jurisdictional issue or time-barred aspect. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263952 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit on ISD invoices issued by the Head Office. The services related to Professional Fees & Brokerage for land transactions were considered qualifying under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 during the relevant period. The Tribunal cited previous case laws to support this decision, emphasizing that business-related activities should qualify for credit. As the period predated the Rule 2(l) amendment, the Appellant was entitled to the CENVAT Credit, with no address of the jurisdictional issue or time-barred aspect. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263952