2012 (7) TMI 891
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Appellant. Shri Pradeep Jetly i/b J.B. Mishra, for the Respondent. ORDER P.C. : Whether the CESTAT while allowing the appeals and restoring the matter for fresh adjudication was justified in directing the appellants to deposit a part of the duty confirmed by the Orders-in-Original, is the question raised in these two appeals. 2. The appeals are admitted on the above question ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in and confirmed the duty demand to the extent the credit was disallowed with interest and penalty. On appeal, the Tribunal by the impugned order directed the appellants to deposit part of the demand confirmed by the adjudicating authority. Challenging the aforesaid order, the appellants have filed the above two appeals. 5. The reasons given by the Tribunal for directing pre-deposit are mu....
TaxTMI