https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171927 The Tribunal's decision to require the appellants to deposit part of the duty demand confirmed by the adjudicating authority was found to be inappropriate due to contradictory reasons provided. The orders directing the deposit were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication without the requirement of pre-deposit. Both appeals were allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:22:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171927 The Tribunal's decision to require the appellants to deposit part of the duty demand confirmed by the adjudicating authority was found to be inappropriate due to contradictory reasons provided. The orders directing the deposit were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication without the requirement of pre-deposit. Both appeals were allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171927