Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (7) TMI 637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng term Capital gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of M/s Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd and claimed the same as exempt. However, consequent to the search operations conducted on 18-01-2007 in the case of Shri Naresh Saboo and others, it came to light that the transaction of purchase of the above said shares was carried through M/s DPS Shares & Securities P Ltd. When a survey was conducted at the premises of the above said share broker on 18-01-2007, the director of the above said share broking company confessed that it did not actually purchase the shares of M/s Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd, but provided only accommodation bills. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessing officer again summoned one of the directors of M/s DPS shar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by holding that the assessee has failed to discharge the burden of proof placed upon her u/s 68 of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal before us. 4. A perusal of the orders passed by the tax authorities would show that they have placed their reliance wholly on the statement given by the directors of M/s DPS Shares & Stock securities Ltd. The contention of the Ld A.R was that the above said share broking firm has not accounted the share transactions carried on by the assessee and hence, in order to suit its convenience, the director of the above said company has stated the transactions of purchase to be bogus transactions. The Ld A.R submitted that the presumption of back dating of purchases is not correct, since the purc....