<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261676</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing a fresh examination by the assessing officer, emphasizing the need for a holistic view of evidence. The appellant&#039;s evidence, including tax returns and bank statements, was not adequately considered by tax authorities, who solely relied on the broker&#039;s statement. The tribunal stressed the importance of thorough examination before drawing adverse inferences. The decision was pronounced on 8th April 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261676</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing a fresh examination by the assessing officer, emphasizing the need for a holistic view of evidence. The appellant&#039;s evidence, including tax returns and bank statements, was not adequately considered by tax authorities, who solely relied on the broker&#039;s statement. The tribunal stressed the importance of thorough examination before drawing adverse inferences. The decision was pronounced on 8th April 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>