Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (3) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng deduction u/s 80HHB? (b) Whether assessee was entitle to deduction for Retention Money?" Re. Question (a): 3. The appellant was interalia engaged in the business of executing projects outside India as defined in Section 80HHB of the Act. The appellant was executing foreign projects i.e. two in Iran, six in Libya and one in Thailand. The appellant for the purpose of computing its deduction under Section 80HHB of the Act computed the same project wise and claimed deduction only in respect of individual projects on which profit was earned without setting of losses incurred in certain individual projects. This deduction was claimed under Section 80HHB of the Act at Rs. 1 Crore keeping in view the cap of gross total income of Rs. 3.16 Cror....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rposes of computing the gross total income, the entire result of all projects i.e. both profit making and loss making foreign projects are to be taken into account. However while computing the deduction under Section 80HHB of the Act, the same has to be worked out for each project separately without taking into account the losses suffered on other projects. However the overall deduction available would be restricted in terms of Section 80A(2) of the Act to the gross total income returned by the assessee. 6. The revenue being aggrieved is in appeal before us. We find that the issue arising in this question is no longer res integra. The question stands concluded by the decision of this Court in CIT Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. reporte....