<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257606</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to compute deductions under Section 80HHB for each project separately, following the precedent set in CIT Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. Additionally, the Court confirmed the entitlement to deduction for Retention Money based on the precedent established in CIT Vs. Associated Cables P. Ltd. As both issues were decided in favor of the respondent-assessee, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 06:59:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257606</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the appellant&#039;s right to compute deductions under Section 80HHB for each project separately, following the precedent set in CIT Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. Additionally, the Court confirmed the entitlement to deduction for Retention Money based on the precedent established in CIT Vs. Associated Cables P. Ltd. As both issues were decided in favor of the respondent-assessee, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>