Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 620

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent. JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. 2. The writ petitioner, who is the appellant in the Appeal No. 567/1985 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control), Appellate Tribunal (West Zonal Bench), Mumbai, has filed this writ petition with the following prayers : (a)     issue a writ of mandam....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s mandatory for maintaining appeal. Moreover, the Tribunal retains the records only for five years after the disposal of a case. Therefore, the records relating to this case has been destroyed after expiry of five years. 4. Sri Mohammed Rafiq, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his argument to prayer (bb) and submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the statutory deposit ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... question are not in the custody of the Revenue. Hence, where the goods in question are in the custody of the Revenue, Section 129E should not have been invoked. The CESTAT ought to have taken into consideration the said factor and should have also applied its mind to the question of undue hardship to the appellant upon considering the existence of a prima facie case. 7. It appears that the ....