<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 620 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255421</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala allowed the petitioner to file a fresh appeal within a specified timeframe after the dismissal of the original appeal due to failure to remit pre-deposit. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 for negligence in pursuing the appeal and directed the department to reconstitute the appellate records. The respondent was instructed to hear and dispose of the fresh appeal within three months, considering relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 620 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255421</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala allowed the petitioner to file a fresh appeal within a specified timeframe after the dismissal of the original appeal due to failure to remit pre-deposit. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 for negligence in pursuing the appeal and directed the department to reconstitute the appellate records. The respondent was instructed to hear and dispose of the fresh appeal within three months, considering relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>