2012 (12) TMI 948

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Maneesh Sharma, Counsel, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.]. - Heard. 2. This is an appeal filed by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 'against order dated 30-3-2012 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter for short called 'the Tribunal') in Appeal Nos. 2288 to 2291 of 2010. 3.&e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... than to defeat it. There is no deliberate delay on the part of the appellant in filing the present appeal and, therefore, the delay deserves to be condoned on the grounds stated in the application. 6. Accordingly and in view of the aforesaid discussion, the application (I.A. No. 01) is allowed. The delay in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. 7. Having heard learned coun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r dated 30-3-2012, extend the period originally granted by the Tribunal in order dated 18-1-2012 by further period of three months to be counted from the date of this order for deposit of Rs. 50 lakhs either in the Tribunal or with the Department as the case may be. In case if the appellant ensure compliance of order dated 18-1-2012 within three months from today by depositing the required amount ....