<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 948 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166349</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part, with the delay in filing the appeal being condoned. The court partially accepted the request for an extension of time to deposit the amount, extending the deadline by three months. Compliance with the modified order was required for the appeal to proceed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to tribunal orders and the court&#039;s discretion in granting extensions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 948 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166349</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part, with the delay in filing the appeal being condoned. The court partially accepted the request for an extension of time to deposit the amount, extending the deadline by three months. Compliance with the modified order was required for the appeal to proceed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to tribunal orders and the court&#039;s discretion in granting extensions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>