2014 (10) TMI 791

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appeal) is filed by the Revenue as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the following substantial questions of law: "i) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) directing the assessing officer to allow depreciation at the rate of 80% under Rule 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt for power generating Machinery? iv) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in granting depreciation at 80% on windmills, even though the assessee is entitled at the rate of 7.69% of the cost and this rate has correctly been allowed by the assessing officer? v) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Inco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Kalamkar (HUF), held as follows: "20. A reading of the above-said decision of the Bombay High Court makes it clear that if the assessee exercised the option in terms of second proviso to Rule 5(1A) of the Income Tax Rules at the time of furnishing of return of income, it will suffice and no separate letter or request or intimation with regard to of exercise of option is required. Since the retu....