2014 (7) TMI 1011
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to given a refund of tax collected by the respondent without any authority of law along with eligible interest by considering the representation dated 02.05.2014, sent by the petitioner within a time frame. 2. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner is a manufacturer of country bricks with the help of villag....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madurai. The Tribunal in its common order in MTSA 361 to 366 and 373 to 376 of 2004 dated 30.08.2010 had dismissed the State appeal. Even before the said order, the petitioner had sent a notice through lawyer on 22.08.2002 for refund of the tax with interest at the rate of 12% p.a.. Since the same was not paid, the petitioner filed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lating to the year 1984-85 does not arise. As regards the other periods, the respondent took a stand that the assessment has become final and the sales tax collected cannot be refunded. Hence, the petitioner filed a Contempt Petition No.13/2005 for disobeying the order of this Court on 17.03.2005. This Court disposed off the Contempt Petition, holding that the respondent are not liable to be proce....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....had sent a representation on 02.05.2014. The petitioner had also enclosed a chart with the details of refund amount to be paid to them along with interest for the period from 1975-76 to 2013-14. But the same was not considered so far. The petitioner is running from pillar to post for the past 40 years to get the refund of tax collected by the respondent without any authority. Hence, the petitioner....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI