<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1011 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249975</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for a tax refund made in 2014 and make a decision within three months in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the need for prompt action without delving into the merits of the claim. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1011 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249975</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for a tax refund made in 2014 and make a decision within three months in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the need for prompt action without delving into the merits of the claim. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>