Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assistance u/s. 28(iiib) against its export eligible to deduction us. 80HHC and not income from other sources ? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in holding that for the purpose of working out deduction u/s.80HHC, clause (a) of section 80HHC becomes applicable instead of clause (b) as the asessee was engaged in the business of cutting and polishing of rough diamonds which are imported from abroad and then selling cut and polished diamonds in trading of polished diamonds and the percentage of trading of polished diamonds is more than 50% of the total export sales ? 2. Though served, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent-assessee. We have heard Mr. Sudhir Mehta learned advocat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s heavily relied upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of P. Navinkumar & Co. It is submitted that as such, against the decision of the learned Tribunal in the case of P. Navinkumar & Co. (supra), the revenue carried the matter before this Court by way of ITR No. 26/2000. It is further submitted that with respect to the aforesaid issue in the case of P. Navinkumar & Co. (supra), at the instance of the Revenue, reference was made to this Court by way of ITR No. 26/2000 and considering the Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, which would be applicable with retrospective effect from April 1, 1992, the Division Bench of this Court, vide its judgment and order dated 10.7.2007has remitted the matter to the learned ITAT for its fresh consid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecomes applicable instead of clause (b) as the assessee was engaged in the business of cutting and polishing of rough diamonds which are imported from abroad and then selling out cut and polished diamonds in trading of polished diamonds and the percentage of trading of polished diamonds is more than 50% of the total export sales, is concerned, as such, the aforesaid issue is now not resintegra in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gem Granites v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, reported in (2004) 271 ITR 322 (SC), by which, with respect of Granite, the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the same as mineral. It is required to be noted that in the said decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to and considered 1984....