<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 520 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249483</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the ITAT for reevaluation of the treatment of a premium on licenses against export eligibility for deduction under sec. 80HHC, emphasizing the need to consider the Fifth proviso and the 2005 Amendment. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the determination of the applicable clause under sec. 80HHC for a business engaged in cutting and polishing rough diamonds, citing a previous decision and a 1984 Circular supporting the eligibility of cut and polished diamonds for deduction. The ITAT was directed to reconsider the issues within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 520 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249483</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the ITAT for reevaluation of the treatment of a premium on licenses against export eligibility for deduction under sec. 80HHC, emphasizing the need to consider the Fifth proviso and the 2005 Amendment. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the determination of the applicable clause under sec. 80HHC for a business engaged in cutting and polishing rough diamonds, citing a previous decision and a 1984 Circular supporting the eligibility of cut and polished diamonds for deduction. The ITAT was directed to reconsider the issues within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>