2014 (4) TMI 408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER Heard Sri Pradeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties' counsel, the matter in question is disposed of finally at admission stage. Facts in brief as submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist are that applicant/revisionist i.e. M/s Kisan Sahkar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....same, present revision under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 has been filed before this Court thereby challenging the order dated 25.01.2014 passed by the the Commercial Tax Tribunal Bench-I, Lucknow in Appeal No. 564 of 2013. Sri Pradeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionist while assailing the impugned order submits that the applicant is a Government Corporation, as such the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d legal position. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case. Needless to mention herein that vide judgment and order dated 04.11.2009 in Writ petition No. 5949(MS) of 2009 (M/s Food Corporation of India, Lucknow Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax Lko. and others) in respect to identical controversy this Court has decided the matter and the operative por....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecovery citation the petitioner's account has been attached, which permitted for operation by the petitioner, till further order of this court. Since I have stayed the recovery proceeding, I hereby provide that the petitioner shall be permitted to operate the account. Since the appeal is still pending considering for adjudication before the appellate authority, no further action is required by....