https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245937 Pending disposal of the first appeal, coercive recovery of the disputed tax demand was kept in abeyance to preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy. The Court noted that a similar controversy had earlier been met with protection against recovery, and, on the material before it, granted limited interim relief to the assessee. Recovery proceedings were stayed for four months or until the first appellate authority decided the appeal, whichever was earlier. The operative effect was temporary protection from immediate recovery during the pendency of the first appellate proceedings. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245937 Pending disposal of the first appeal, coercive recovery of the disputed tax demand was kept in abeyance to preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy. The Court noted that a similar controversy had earlier been met with protection against recovery, and, on the material before it, granted limited interim relief to the assessee. Recovery proceedings were stayed for four months or until the first appellate authority decided the appeal, whichever was earlier. The operative effect was temporary protection from immediate recovery during the pendency of the first appellate proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245937