Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 378

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ctor, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER After hearing both the sides, we find that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of galvanized and corrugated sheets. A dispute arose between them and the jurisdictional Central Excise authorities as to whether such process amounts to manufacture or not. Provisional assessment was resorted to and the matter reached the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....khs. For better appreciation, we reproduce the relevant portion from the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order as under :- "Keeping the above factors in view, I find that penalty of Rs. 60 Lakhs imposed on the Appellant by the Assistant Commissioner is too harsh when the dispute was a bona fide one which is also supported by the case laws cited by the Appellant, namely, Techumesh Products (I) Ltd. v. CC....