<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244923</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where the dispute over manufacture was found to be bona fide and no mala fide intention was attributed to the assessee. The appellate authority&#039;s finding that the controversy was purely legal and that the assessee had not acted with dishonest intent was not challenged by the Revenue. In the absence of any basis for penal action, the penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244923</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where the dispute over manufacture was found to be bona fide and no mala fide intention was attributed to the assessee. The appellate authority&#039;s finding that the controversy was purely legal and that the assessee had not acted with dishonest intent was not challenged by the Revenue. In the absence of any basis for penal action, the penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>