2014 (2) TMI 721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Shri H G Dharmadhikari, Adv. PER : P R Chandrasekharan The Revenue is in appeal against Order-in-Original NO.06/CEX/2007 dated 16/03/2007 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune. 2. The facts relevant to the case are as follows:- 2.1 The respondent, M/s. Associated Capsules Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of HG Capsules and they hav....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd therefore the appellant is rightly eligible for the Cenvat Credit taken. Aggrieved of the same, Revenue is in appeal before us. 3. It is the contention of the Revenue that in the case of S.R. Tissue Pvt. Ltd., the Hon'ble Apex court has held that cutting and slitting of jumbo of rolls aluminium foils into smaller size would not amount to manufacture. In view of the Apex Court's decision, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....him on the said final product. Therefore, in terms of the impugned notification, the appellant is eligible for the benefit of said notification, the appellant is eligible for the benefit of said notification. However, with regard to the condition (c) it is the submission of the Ld. AR that matter needs to be verified by the adjudicating authority. 5. The Ld. Counsel for the respondent submit....