Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 24/2012-CE dated 19/04/2012 so as to avoid reversal of Cenvat credit and the consequential demand of duty.
Analysis: The demand related to the period up to 15/03/2012, which fell within the temporal coverage of the notification. The record also showed satisfaction of the first two conditions of the notification, namely that the credit was taken up to the specified date and that excise duty had been paid on removal of the final product. As to the third condition, the respondent stated that no refund claim had been made, and the benefit was held available subject to departmental verification of that assertion.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the benefit of the notification, reversal of Cenvat credit was not required, and the duty demand was unsustainable, subject to verification of condition (c).