Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (1) TMI 1589

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Biscuits Ltd., a sister concern of the assessee was manufacturing biscuits under the name "Nutrine Biscuits". The marketing of all confectionery and biscuits products were carried on by the sister concern M/s. B.V.Reddy P. Ltd. M/s. Sara Lee Bakery India (P) Ltd., took over all the three business. The aggregate of all the consideration payable to all the three companies was fixed at Rs.33 crores. The consideration paid for taking over the assessee Company is Rs.4.50 crores. The said amount was bifurcated as Rs.275 lakhs towards Trademarks and technical know-how, Rs.75 lakhs towards Copyrights and Rs.100 lakhs towards Non-compete compensation. The Assessing Officer asked the assessee to justify its claim. Assessee gave a reply. The Assessing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....together constituted an integrated Code. Therefore, where the computation provisions cannot apply, it is evident that such a case was not intended to fall within the charging section, which, in the present case, is Section 45. That section contemplates that any surplus accruing on transfer of capital assets is chargeable to tax in the previous year in which transfer took place. In this case, transfer took place on 18.7.1969. The second test which needs to be applied is the test of allocation/attribution. This test is spelt out in the judgment of this Court in Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (Land Department) [1965] 57 ITR 299. This test applies to a slump transaction. The object behind this test is to find out whether the slump price was capable of ....