Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (1) TMI 1554

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....E-CHD-2008 dated 16.10.2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeal), Customs Central Excise, Chandigarh. 2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s VTC Transport Co. (hereinafter referred to as respondents) are provider of 'Clearing and Forwarding Agents Services', 'Cargo Handling Agents Services' and 'Goods Transport Agency Services'. During the scrutiny of records it was found that they were providing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otice was adjudicated by original authority Joint Commissioner vide Order-in-Original No. 16/ST/JC/CHD/ADJ/2008 dated 30.04.2008 in which the demand of Rs. 35,66,276/- was confirmed along with interest of Rs. 4,73,093/- against the respondents. Penalty equal to amount of Rs. 2% of the confirmed amount per month and equal to the Tax amount was also imposed on the respondents under Section 76 and 78....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and order of the Commissioner (Appeal) needs to be set aside. 4. Heard Ms. Ranjana Jha, Jt. CDR. None appeared on behalf of the respondents. 5. After going through the case records I find that only issue involved in the present appeal is whether penalty under Section 76 is imposable when the penalty under Section 78 has been imposed under the Finance Act. We find that issue came up for decision....