Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was leviable when penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act had also been imposed for the same period and conduct.
Analysis: The only substantive question was the coexistence of penalties under Sections 76 and 78. The Tribunal followed the binding view that these penalties operate in distinct fields and can be imposed separately, even where the default arises out of the same transaction. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified in deleting the penalty under Section 76 merely because penalty under Section 78 had been sustained and partly paid.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 76 was held to be imposable in addition to penalty under Section 78, and the relief granted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside.