Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (1) TMI 727

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ORDER Per P.K. Das; 1. All these applications are arising from a common order and hence are taken up together for disposal. 2. Applicant is engaged in the manufacture of various types of motor vehicle chassis. Applicant received back some duty paid chassis at their factory during Dec'08 to Dec'09 for repair and reconditioning and availed Cenvat credit under Rule 16 of Cenvat Credit Rules,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n book. He submits that Tribunal in the case of Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs CCE New Delhi - 2002 (146) ELT 427 (Tri.-Del.) has held that dismantling and rebuilding of the vehicle amounts to 'manufacture' of vehicle. He submits that this decision has been upheld by Honble Punjab & Haryana High Court as reported in 2010-TIOL-145-HC-P&H. He also relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Apoll....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Markfed HDPE Sacks Plant Vs CCE Ludhiana - 2011 (271) ELT 396 (Tri.-Del.) and Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. - 2008 (225) ELT 385 (Tri.-Bang.) held that the assessee has to pay the amount equal to credit availed by them in the case of goods returned to factory for repair and not subject to process of manufacture. He strongly contested the chart produced b....