https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242509 The Tribunal addressed the dispute on whether the process undertaken by the applicant constituted manufacturing under Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the maintainability of the demand for an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit. Finding a factual dispute on the manufacturing aspect, the Tribunal directed the applicant to make a partial deposit, considering certain exported chassis. The decision granted temporary relief on the predeposit pending appeal, emphasizing the need for further examination during the appeal hearing. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:11:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242509 The Tribunal addressed the dispute on whether the process undertaken by the applicant constituted manufacturing under Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and the maintainability of the demand for an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit. Finding a factual dispute on the manufacturing aspect, the Tribunal directed the applicant to make a partial deposit, considering certain exported chassis. The decision granted temporary relief on the predeposit pending appeal, emphasizing the need for further examination during the appeal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242509