Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 1143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Jain, AR ORDER Per Sahab Singh: These stay applications have been filed by Shri Giriraj Jee Office Systems and Shri Rajesh Kumar against imposition of penalties imposed by Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi and confirmed by Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise in the impugned order. 2. Brief facts of the case are that Shri Giriraj Jee Office Systems are engaged in the m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....yment of Redemption Fine of Rs. 1,25,000/- and penalty of Rs.50,000/- was imposed on both the appellants. Appeals were filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise who rejected their appeals, but reduced the redemption fine in respect of seized goods from Rs.1,25,000/- to Rs.50,000/-. 3. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellants have not redeemed the g....