https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239966 The Tribunal granted a stay against the recovery of penalties imposed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi, confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, in a case involving allegations of duty evasion by Shri Giriraj Jee Office Systems. The Tribunal considered that since the confiscated goods were under the control of the Central Excise authorities, waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery of penalties until the appeals were resolved were warranted under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act. This decision underscores the significance of adherence to excise laws and the availability of waivers in appropriate circumstances. en-us Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:24:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239966 The Tribunal granted a stay against the recovery of penalties imposed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi, confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, in a case involving allegations of duty evasion by Shri Giriraj Jee Office Systems. The Tribunal considered that since the confiscated goods were under the control of the Central Excise authorities, waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery of penalties until the appeals were resolved were warranted under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act. This decision underscores the significance of adherence to excise laws and the availability of waivers in appropriate circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239966