Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (1) TMI 415

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion 7, Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal Act, 1995 read with section 86(2), Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. A common question is involved in these revision petitions and as such they are being decided by this common order. In all the three impugned orders, the learned Member, Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, has reduced the amount of penalty. 2.. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dispute that a revision petition under section 86, Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 lies if it involves a question of law. Reduction in the amount of penalty does not involve any question of law. It is simply a discretionary order. In Food Corporation of India v. Commissioner of Sales Tax [1983] 54 STC 332 (MP), honourable Mr. Justice G.L. Oza (as he then was) has observed at page 338, para 14 "wheth....