<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 415 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159007</link>
    <description>A revision petition under section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 lies only where a question of law is involved. Reduction of penalty was treated as an exercise of discretion, and the tribunal held that the facts warranting imposition or reduction of penalty did not, by themselves, raise a question of law. The challenge to the reduced penalty therefore did not satisfy the statutory basis for revision, and the revision petitions were not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:19:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 415 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159007</link>
      <description>A revision petition under section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 lies only where a question of law is involved. Reduction of penalty was treated as an exercise of discretion, and the tribunal held that the facts warranting imposition or reduction of penalty did not, by themselves, raise a question of law. The challenge to the reduced penalty therefore did not satisfy the statutory basis for revision, and the revision petitions were not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>