Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 598

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....clared it as "Interlining Fabric (Flock)" in Bill of entry dated 31-10-2011 filed at Tuticorin. The price of goods was declared as Rs.9.03 per mtr. Accompanying documents showed the description of goods as "Interlining fabrics" which is a cheaper variety of fabrics. This gave rise to suspicion that this was a case of misdeclaration of value goods. On examination of the goods by the customs officer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... view that the order of the adjudicating authority was not maintainable mainly on the following grounds:-    (i) Copy of the bill of entry of the goods filed at Nava Sheva, Mumbai has not been given to the respondent;    (ii) It was not established that the goods imported at Mumbai were similar or identical to the impugned goods;    (iii) The goods were not at the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ustify setting aside the adjudication order as done by the Commissioner (Appeal). He submits that goods imported at Mumbai were similar to the impugned goods. 4. The Counsel for the Respondent submits repeated the arguments given by Commissioner (Appeal). He emphasise that the appellant has imported 124800 Mtrs. of the fabric and such quantity itself would indicate that the goods were not the cos....