<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 598 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay petition and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, which overturned the adjudication authority&#039;s order to increase the value of imported fabrics due to suspected undervaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for physical samples or identical parameters when comparing goods and highlighted the potential for unjust results when relying solely on database entries without proper specification. As a result, the refund of excess duty paid was not stayed, and the original decision stood in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 598 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s stay petition and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, which overturned the adjudication authority&#039;s order to increase the value of imported fabrics due to suspected undervaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for physical samples or identical parameters when comparing goods and highlighted the potential for unjust results when relying solely on database entries without proper specification. As a result, the refund of excess duty paid was not stayed, and the original decision stood in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>