Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (9) TMI 579

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the present proceedings bearing those principles discussed by us. 2. The petitioner-assessee is a manufacturer of aluminium vessels and is a dealer registered with the Additional Sales Tax Officer, Chengannur. The assessment year is 1986-87. By the assessment order (annexure A) dated February 26, 1990, the Sales Tax Officer decided to make an addition of 10 per cent to the sales and 70 per cent with reference to the purchases. 3. For the assessment year in question, a total turnover of Rs. 12,30,402.06 and corresponding taxable turnover of Rs. 12,21,012.06 is written. This would obviously show that the difference is very little. The accounts were called and verified even then. In addition thereto, it is found that the business plac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essels and is a dealer registered with the Additional Sales Tax Officer, Chengannur. The assessment year is 1986-87. By the assessment order (annexure A) dated February 26, 1990, the Sales Tax Officer decided to make an addition of 10 per cent to the sales and 70 per cent with reference to the purchases. 3. For the assessment year in question, a total turnover of Rs. 12,30,402.06 and corresponding taxable turnover of Rs. 12,21,012.06 is written. This would obviously show that the difference is very little. The accounts were called and verified even then. In addition thereto, it is found that the business place appeared to have been inspected by the intelligence squad on October 23, 1986 and SIR appears to have been prepared. 4. Wit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of 10 per cent to the total turnover and 70 per cent to the purchase turnover, we would like to convey to the authorities what we were inevitably required to observe earlier. 10.. The Sales Tax Officer, in his order (annexure A), has pointed out the statutory provisions of rule 32(1)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules requiring every dealer to keep and maintain a daily cash book. 11.. The Sales Tax Officer has considered the order of the Deputy Commissioner reducing the penalty in a ridiculous fashion still to sticking to it to state that even then the Deputy Commissioner has not found out that there is no case of omission. The Sales Tax Officer has not taken into consideration the factual peculiarities that the four industrial....