<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158944</link>
    <description>Rejection of accounts and consequential estimated additions cannot be sustained where alleged cash-book defects and stock variation are explained by the business realities on record and do not establish unreliability of the accounts. The requirement to maintain a daily cash book under Rule 32(1)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules must be applied in light of the actual operating arrangement of the business, especially where multiple units function at the same place with overlapping stock storage. On that factual basis, the assessment and connected orders were set aside and the matter was directed to proceed on the assessee&#039;s return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:55:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=335272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158944</link>
      <description>Rejection of accounts and consequential estimated additions cannot be sustained where alleged cash-book defects and stock variation are explained by the business realities on record and do not establish unreliability of the accounts. The requirement to maintain a daily cash book under Rule 32(1)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules must be applied in light of the actual operating arrangement of the business, especially where multiple units function at the same place with overlapping stock storage. On that factual basis, the assessment and connected orders were set aside and the matter was directed to proceed on the assessee&#039;s return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>