2013 (11) TMI 499

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Petitioners : Mr. E. Vijay Anand For the Respondent : Mr. Akbar Row ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. Paul Vasanthakumar,J) For the sake of convenience, in this order, the parties are referred to as arrayed in Writ Petition No.13928 of 2012. 2. The first Writ Petition is filed by the Commissioner of Customs and others challenging the order made in Original Application No....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uently the ACR entries were communicated, the crucial issue in these Writ Petitions is as to whether the petitioners were justified in relying upon the non-communicated ACR of the first respondent to decide the issue relating to his eligibility to get Second ACP. It is an admitted case that the ACR entries, namely "Just adequate" were not communicated to the first respondent on the crucial date th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the annual confidential report of a public servant whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than armed forces), it has civil consequences because it may affect his chances of promotion or getting other benefits. Hence, such non-communication would be arbitrary, and as such violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The same view has been reiterated in the above ref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid issue in such manner has gone to the matter on merits and passed an order with direction to grant Second ACP to the first respondent. 7. The learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that the order of the Tribunal may be set aside as requested by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the matter may be remitted to the second petitioner to consider his case for the Second ACP f....