https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239322 The court set aside the order denying the Second ACP to the respondent due to non-communicated ACR entries, emphasizing the importance of disclosing such entries to public servants. The Supreme Court's precedent highlighted that withholding ACR information affecting promotions could violate constitutional rights. As the ACR entries were not shared with the respondent on the critical date, the denial of the ACP was deemed unjust. The matter was remanded for reconsideration by the Additional Commissioner of Customs within three months, aligning with the court's directives and principles. Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs. en-us Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239322 The court set aside the order denying the Second ACP to the respondent due to non-communicated ACR entries, emphasizing the importance of disclosing such entries to public servants. The Supreme Court's precedent highlighted that withholding ACR information affecting promotions could violate constitutional rights. As the ACR entries were not shared with the respondent on the critical date, the denial of the ACP was deemed unjust. The matter was remanded for reconsideration by the Additional Commissioner of Customs within three months, aligning with the court's directives and principles. Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239322