Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d has erred both in law and on facts of the case in passing an appellate order u/s. 250 of the I.T. Act for Asst. Year 2006-07 on 08.04.2010. (2) The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs.81,757/- u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act. (3) The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of brokerage Expenditure provided at Rs. 2,75,000/-." 2. The first ground is general and has not been pressed by the appellant. The same is dismissed. 3. The second ground of appeal is against the disallowance of Rs. 81,757/- u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The A.O. observed that the assessee has debited interest at Rs. 18,79,305.78/- in p&l account. On verification of details filed with the submission the assessee had not fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er in prescribed form within prescribed time. But Hon'ble Gujarat High Court held that this infraction in such requirement would not make the requirement of deduction at source applicable under sub Section 2 of Section 194C of the IT Act. Thus, he requested to delete the addition. At the outset, ld. Sr. D.R. relied upon the order of the CIT (A). 6. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. The assessee had submitted the photo copy of Form No. 15H before the A.O. on 28.11.2008 not in the CIT office in the prescribed time limited. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of CIT vs. Valibhai Khanbhai Mankad (supra), on TDS deductable u/s. 194C and Form No. 15I was to be submitted within prescribed time before the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed within prescribed time." By respectfully following the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of CIT vs. Valibhai Khanbhai Mankad (supra), the proposition propounded by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of TDS u/s. 194C(3) and Form No. 15I not submitted before the Commissioner in prescribed time in prescribed form is applicable on lapse made by the deductor u/s.194A read with 197A of the IT Act. Thus, we allow the assessee's appeal. 7. The third ground of appeal is against confirming the disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 2,75,000/-. The A.O. found that assessee had shown provision for brokerage at Rs. 2,75,000/-. No satisfactory explanation was given by the assessee before the A.O. Thus, he made addition of Rs.2,75,00....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ess of Steel Tubes, M.S. Galvanised Pipes, M.S. Pipes Fittings etc. on semi wholesale basis. This is a very competitive business in Metro Cities. On consistent basis business is carried out through trade brokers only to whom brokerage is paid. Thus, expenditure towards brokerage inevitable in nature of activity carried out by the appellant. The total sales during the year was Rs. 6.58 crore on which brokerage of Rs.8,17,071/- was claimed @ 1.24%, which was lesser compared to previous year. The TDS has been deducted on payment of brokerage. All trades of recipients with full address and PAN had been given to the A.O. during the assessment proceeding vide letter dated 2nd September, 19/24/28.11.2008 and he prayed to delete the addition. At th....