<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 311 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239134</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of both the interest amount under section 40(a)(ia) and the brokerage expenditure. It emphasized compliance with TDS requirements and the crystallization of liabilities based on sales in determining allowable deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 311 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239134</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of both the interest amount under section 40(a)(ia) and the brokerage expenditure. It emphasized compliance with TDS requirements and the crystallization of liabilities based on sales in determining allowable deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>