2013 (11) TMI 76

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gation this Tribunal vide Order dated 16.02.2010 had disallowed the Cenvat Credit on two items, namely, Continuous Mixture and Thermostat holding that these were not capital goods within the definition of Rule 57Q of erstwhile Central Excise Rules. This Tribunal has remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for verification of the Cenvat Credit involved on Thermostat which the Revenue claimed as Rs.21,82,755/- and the Appellant disputed stating it as Rs.11,198/-. The Ld. Advocate further submitted that before the adjudicating authority, in de novo adjudication they have categorically submitted in their written submission dated 02.06.2011 that they had availed the Modvat Credit of Rs.21,93,953/- against Bill of Entry No.133 dated 19.04....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mely, Thermostat. On a query from the Bench as to what amount of Cenvat Credit involved on Continuous Mixture on which the Cenvat Credit was disallowed by the Tribunal, the Ld. Advocate has submitted that it is reflected at Annexure 'A' to the show cause notice and the amount involved was Rs.3,86,280.52/-. 3. Per contra the Ld. A.R. for the Revenue has submitted that in the Annexure A to the show cause notice against the Column Invoice No. and date, the Invoice No.133/19.04.1995 has been clearly mentioned and the amount of Cenvat Credit involved was 21,93,953.07. Thus, the item Thermostat against Invoice No.133 dated 19.04.1995, is different from the item Thermostat shown in the present Bill of Entry. 4. Heard both sides and perused t....