<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the disputed Cenvat Credit amount of Rs.21,93,953.07 and stayed its recovery during the appeal process. This decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence regarding the disputed invoice, specifically Invoice No.133 dated 19.04.1995. The Tribunal emphasized that if the Revenue could provide proof of the invoice&#039;s existence, they could seek further directions from the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 76 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the disputed Cenvat Credit amount of Rs.21,93,953.07 and stayed its recovery during the appeal process. This decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence regarding the disputed invoice, specifically Invoice No.133 dated 19.04.1995. The Tribunal emphasized that if the Revenue could provide proof of the invoice&#039;s existence, they could seek further directions from the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>