Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 878

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pardiwala, senior Advocate with Atul K. Jasani ORDER P. C. :- 1. In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 1998-99, the following questions of law are raised for our consideration:- a) The substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is regarding the true scope and correct interpretation of Section 36 and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd in law, the Tribunal is right in allowing the interest paid on inter corporate deposits ? d) The fourt substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is regarding the true scope and correct interpretation of Section 37 and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the tribunal is right in allowing the enhancement....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Tribunal and, therefore, see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 4. So far as question (c) is concerned, the Tribunal in the impugned order has upheld the finding of fact recorded by the CIT(A) that the borrowed funds on which interest has been paid was made for the purpose of business and consequently, the respondent-assessee's claim u/s.36(1)(iii) of the Act is correctly a....