<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 878 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238423</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal on all issues raised, including the interpretation of Section 36 for guarantee commission, Section 43(2) for loss on re-valuation of foreign currency, Section 36(1)(iii) for interest on inter corporate deposits, and Section 37 for enhancement of lease rental. The Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and CIT(A) based on previous precedents and factual findings, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 878 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238423</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal on all issues raised, including the interpretation of Section 36 for guarantee commission, Section 43(2) for loss on re-valuation of foreign currency, Section 36(1)(iii) for interest on inter corporate deposits, and Section 37 for enhancement of lease rental. The Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and CIT(A) based on previous precedents and factual findings, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>